| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
met worst
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
15
   |
Posted - 2012.01.02 05:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ocih wrote:I haven't seen a thread about the PI changes in weeks. You bored OP? Need to open some old wounds? Can't find anything more current to troll about? If you were trying to be original, remember the game is 8 years old. That's not going to be easy. Devs can't do it and they get paid to.
Actually he was referring to a thread I started today QUERYING why PI in lowsec has been "Interbussed".
I ASKED whether it's a DUST 514 preparation.
I ASKED if it's putting more cookies into large alliance wallets.
I ASKED other lowsec PI'ers what their opinions were.
I DON'T recall whining but hey, if that's his lot then so be it.
MAYBE he SHOULD have ASKED if I was WHINING or COMMENTING.
The DIFFERENCE requires a little intellect. OP FAILED.
PS: DAMNED CAPS key, It'S SoOoOo unPredICtable.
|
met worst
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 05:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Karash Amerius wrote:PI was initially a system where no real PVP (econ or combat) could occur, and that is fundamentally against the design philosophy of Eve Online.
I lolled soooo hard.
Eve's "design philosophy" is "build it and they will come". It's called a SANDBOX. PvP happens as a RESULT of the sandbox just as "building precious PI empires" is ALSO a result in that very same sandbox.
More importantly, what people DO in that sandbox is ALWAYS open for critique and improvement and CCP frequently make changes based on "heaps of people whining". Numbers will ALWAYS win.
You have added little more than a personal ***** session about bitchin' and for mine, you do the topic a FAVOUR by bringing the anghst to the fore. Well done.
But really. What's at stake for Eve? If low-seccers pull the pin on PI then there is even LESS reason for lowsec to exist and even LESS to shoot at when DUST 514 arrives. Think about it.
|
met worst
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 05:39:00 -
[3] - Quote
Nope. Having a laugh actually. Gathering classification intel on users of the forum. Which column shall I put you?
Column 1: Morons
Column 2: Meme vomitters
Column 3: Cliche regurgitants
Column 4: Macros
Column 5: Money traders
Column 6: Everyone else
Did I miss anyone? |
met worst
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 05:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:met worst wrote:Nope. Having a laugh actually. Gathering classification intel on users of the forum. Which column shall I put you? Column 1: Morons Column 2: Meme vomitters Column 3: Cliche regurgitants Column 4: Macros Column 5: Money traders Column 6: Everyone else Did I miss anyone? Wait, there's forum Macros? And RMTers use the Eve-O Forums? Which subforum? And I'd be happy to join you right in Column 1, if only to keep you company.
Macros runners whine about bot controls.
RMT'ers complain about their bans that they didn't deserve.
And touche'..  |
met worst
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 01:02:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:non judgement wrote:Sort of how when EVE Online started and there was mining in it. Which is a very nasty form of PVP?
Wait a second. Mining isn't PVP Of course it is. Do you see any NPCs competing with you over those minerals? met worst wrote:Eve's "design philosophy" is "build it and they will come". It's called a SANDBOX. PvP happens as a RESULT of the sandbox No. PvP is the fuel of the sandbox GÇö it's what makes the core engine (the market) move and makes all the building have a purpose.
Pffft. Once again you dissected a paragraph and took the statement out of context.
My response was to a comment that PI does not in itself attract PvP and therefore "had to be changed".
The point (in the ENTIRE paragraph) was that the sandbox ALSO allows for "precious PI empires" to be built. And PI itself can also be a catalyst to generate more PvP both economically and militarily. They are not mutually exclusive. |
| |
|